Don’t let the clunky title fool you. This is a great book. I’d come to believe that molinism was the way out of the conundrum of sorting divine sovereignty and human responsibility, but it was this book that led me fully to the invigorating air of clarity. Stratton’s gift is logical argumentation that guides you by the hand to conclusions.

So persuasive was his logical arguments that I went online and watched debates he had with others. It was as if others brought their knives to his gunfight. Strangely enough, some he debated were even more polished in the art of debate, but he just seemed to have them where it counted—actual arguments. It didn’t hurt that he was gracious either. Fortunately, that gracious spirit is also found in this book, though he is relentless in marshaling arguments and looking at the subject from all different angles.

The first two chapters are foundational and I suggest you take your time with them. Here is where you will make a quick observation. This is not casual reading. Make sure you notice that there is no fault in Stratton’s writing, but just that this is a deep subject. I think if you read an occasional paragraph over, and read slowly at all times, you will find this work quite lucid. In my judgment, we have for so long talked in broad generalities about things, and have just not followed through on what they mean. I think there’s a lot of layers inside us that have to be worked through. For example, he will explain what he calls exhaustive divine determinism (EDD), which he wisely defines as “all events are casually determined by God”. When I say there are many things that we have not thought through, you will see the profound implications if God has truly caused every single thing that happens, including every choice that’s ever made.

You probably already know, and it’s an argument that Stratton makes, that a lot of people can kind of agree with libertarian freedom until we touch upon salvation. Then we enter old battlegrounds where we must stay true to our alma mater, so to speak. Then, the focus shifts from merely seeking the truth to the propping up of the home team. I am being a bit vague on purpose here because a lot of people predetermine what they’re going to think about a book like this before they ever read the first word. This book is such a great one and it deserves better.

Chapters 3-10 survey historical periods successively to see how the debates crystallized. Sometimes I think this is not always helpful for a theological work, but in this case, it really is essential. Quite simply, many things, including definitions and categories, have all sprung from debates rather than a direct study of scripture.

Chapters 12-13 bring us back to direct theological issues. What libertarian freedom and its logical necessity simply must be addressed. I thought Stratton was masterful in showing that there logically must be some level of libertarian freedom.

The next chapter introduces us to Luis de Molina. He was a guy who made a brilliant observation that God must possess middle knowledge. Far more than anything about the guy himself, is the scriptural and logical weight of what he said. To my mind, it is profound.

Chapter 15 is the capstone of the book. Here he makes his arguments for middle knowledge and molinism. It is hard for me to see how someone coming with an open mind and a desire for truth could walk away without agreeing with what is presented here.

Chapter 16 is something of an icing-on-the-cake type of chapter. There is some apologetic ways that this teaching can help us. It’s not the heart of the book, but it is very interesting.

I rarely use the term “tour de force ” because it can be so cliche, but it fits here. Another thing I rarely say for the same reason is that I wish this book were so much better known, but I can hardly think of when I meant it more. 

I received this book free from the publisher. I was not required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255.

A book on the theology of Revelation likely makes you ask, what is the author’s approach to prophecy, followed by you deciding if you find it interesting all based on that approach being in your lane. What would you think if I told you that you could have a fantastic book on Revelation’s theology and it made no difference at all what your interpretive preferences were? This volume is that book!

In fact, I’m sure Mr. Duvall and I do not agree in our approaches to prophecy and I love this book. I hardly can describe all I found that enlightened me and opened avenues that I will want to travel in future studies. All the volumes in this series so far are impressive, but this is one of the best. Perhaps it is the intense coverage of a smaller portion of Scripture. Perhaps it’s just the fascination of the Revelation. Whatever it is, it’s simply the case.

By the end of chapter 6 you have mostly covered areas typically found in a traditional introduction of a major commentary. When chapter 7 addresses grammar it delves into symbolic language. Some of us might believe not everything he finds symbolic actually is, but he gives nice coverage. The next chapter covers the prevalent use of the OT found in Revelation. Chapter 10 overviews the major interpretive systems that so often dominate discussions and he is gentle in his presentation.

Chapter 11 entitled “A Literary Theological Reading of Revelation” is a lengthy chapter of over 100 pages that gives what I guess we’d call a streamlined commentary. The learning and help in this compact section is impressive.

This work saves the best for last as the final section gives nine extraordinary chapters on the major theological themes. Again, no matter the interpretive grid you filter through, these themes are both profound and undeniable. If I had to pick a favorite, I guess I’d go with the one on worship. If you think about it, how pervasive worship is in Revelation.

I’ll be using this book for years to come. If you give this one a try, I think you might join me.

I received this book free from the publisher. I was not required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255.

Sign me up as a fan of the beatific vision! Before I had barely paid attention to the whole concept, and thought, at most, well, that’s a sweet little idea. Now Mr. Parkison has won me over.

This is one of the best books I’ve read this year. Remember in the Psalms: “Mercy and truth are met together; righteousness and peace have kissed each other.” Well here the kisses are between scholarly work and devotional manna. I suppose he was aiming at scholarly, but the devotional came bursting out. How the scholarly rigor didn’t bury the moving manna is beyond me. But I’ll take it.

There were places, to be sure, where he played with the fire of scholasticism that has burned up many a good book, but somehow he darted back out into the sun quite often. The chapters in question are three and four. Here he worked through the history of how the beatific vision has developed and been viewed. He even dared enter into the debated points and with charitable grace he kept it interesting and productive to matters of faith. I was about to be perturbed when he started down the pointless path that this lined up with Reformation thinking. Isn’t being biblical enough? But I couldn’t do it. Every time I tried he said some other touching thing.

Before these chapters were ones explaining what the beatific vision even is and its biblical credibility. Let me describe it this way, this gazing upon God takes some of the things that seem most big picture to me and tied them together in a way that they should have always been. I need not rehash it. You can read it yourself. But it sure moved me.

Chapter 5 (“Retrieval for Reformation Evangelicals”) has as dull a title as possible, but it was full of life. And it grew more so as it went along. There was doctrinal profundity in spades. Its gift was tying all back to a full orbed Trinitarian theological understanding.

The final chapter takes this grand doctrine and rubs it on like healing oil all over many facets of the Christian life.

How have I never heard of Samuel Parkison? I bet I’ll be watching for his name in the future.

I received this book free from the publisher. I was not required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255.

Fascinating! I’ve just never read anything before on the material covered here. I’ve read Bavinck, of course, but here he digs in with that penetrating style of his in a place I need led by the hand.

Somehow I missed the publishing event of this three-volume set and make my introduction through this volume 3. When it arrived, I laid other things aside and jumped in. You probably wouldn’t normally label an ethics book captivating. As good as Bavinck is, you might not call him captivating usually either as he is quite exacting in his approach. His gift is depth of content. What a mind he possessed and to read him makes you a learner. Still, I can’t believe how quickly I went through this work.

The bulk of the book is on “The Life Spheres in Which the Moral Life Must Manifest Itself”. As heady as that title is, the material distills a mountain of study and lays it at your feet in around 200 pages. Along the way, he covers family, the “duty” to marry (hadn’t thought of that), qualifications for marriage (who you can marry), betrothal and wedding, essence of marriage, and divorce.

Here’s why the book is so fascinating. He gathers all the Bible says and on some points the Bible says little specifically. He covers what Christian groups have thought from the most to least known. What you will discover is the lack of consistency among Christians. He is not so “dogmatic” except where he feels the evidence warrants it. He is honest enough not to just trumpet his opinion. He also shows how these ethics have often showed up in laws. It’s a bit tilted towards Dutch law, but that’s understandable as he ministered there. You will at least leave this book knowing what questions you must ask yourself.

The last third of the book changes direction. It addresses philosophical ethics first. I thought he was good at probing the subject, putting it in perspective, and making sure to not allow it to plow over the gospel. In the last part, contemporary morality is covered. You can decide for yourself how contemporary it is. In my view, we must at least wrestle with some of the things he brings up.

I want to consult Bavinck on any subject he covers. I may not agree, but I know I’ll be richer for reading it. Here he plows fields off the beaten trail, and I highly recommend it. 

I received this book free from the publisher. I was not required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255.