Truman by David McCullough

You know you’re a great presidential biographer if your work substantially moves the needle on how that president is viewed. That’s exactly what master biographer David McCullough did here. It amazes me how many people tell me they’ve read this book.

I even enjoyed the early section on his family background as it touched on several exciting events that happened around Missouri. His family history is colorful to say the least. Hard workers though they were, they could lose money with the best of them. Strangely enough, that’s exactly how it was for Truman himself. He failed in so many ways, lost so much money while having as strong a work ethic as any president I’ve read about, and got to middle age without ever hitting his stride. Had he not fallen in with the shady Pendergast machine he likely never would have. That association would always plague him, but he wouldn’t have a political career in the first place without it.

What is even more startling is how honest he was and how he managed to keep that reputation throughout his career. He is one of the rare politicians that earned that reputation. He had a very high ethical standard as well. He is the only Democratic president of the 20th century they can list avoiding a whole slew of sins that all the rest of them committed.

There was something real about him. He was who he was. He was incredibly practically minded. Perhaps you should say it was Providence itself that brought him into office at that moment in history. It could be said because that good practical nature came in handy. He was intelligent, but occasionally, I wondered if he could be a bit naïve. He had his limitations, but was one of those rare people who knew what they were. His lack of pride and hubris was perhaps his most compelling trait.

He clearly had much exposure to Christianity. He did profess to believe in it on many occasions. Perhaps the only thing that McCullough didn’t know how to uncover was whether or not it was a deeply personal faith or not. It was hard to tell whether or not he was more of a moralist than a Christian, but we will give him the benefit of the doubt by several statements that he made, and several actions he did like kissing the Bible at his swearing in.

Pretty much an afterthought on the presidential ticket of an ailing, dying FDR, no one even thought to bring him up to speed on the most pressing issues of the war. He was not prepared the day FDR died, and he openly admitted it, which was so refreshing, and yet acquitted himself quite well to see the war through to the end. He will always be the president who dropped the atomic bomb, but it clearly made sense to him from even a moral level. There weren’t many voices around him tell him not to do it either. Those voices didn’t arise till later on. He was sobered a bit more about it later as well.

His stratospheric poll numbers dropped quickly after his success with a war won quickly in his term. I personally appreciated the way he handled the Soviet Union. Just as he should have with a major WW2 ally, he gave them a chance. His domestic policies are not to my taste, but he was fairly successful in pushing them. In my view, he perfected the whole “we are for the people and Republicans are for Wall Street.” What stands out is how passionately he believed it. For many, that is just playing the game of politics, or strategy if you will; but in his simple way he was a true believer.

Perhaps his greatest political feat was pulling off his unexpected reelection in 1948. It’s almost as if he was the only person who thought he could win. He never wavered and shocked his opponents and friends.

That second term had several challenges, chiefly the Korean Conflict. I’m not a fan of the UN, but I agree with his stance overall. He set the ground rules for the Cold War and that made it possible for handling Communism without it becoming a hot war. His firing of the legendary MacArthur was a bold move too and I feel likely the correct one.

By the end of his term, Truman showed a few cracks in his amazing vitality. There were a few episodes of pettiness that were surprising, but no failings that would sully his overall reputation as a decent guy who wasn’t too big for his britches.

I wonder if McCullough exaggerated his conflict with Eisenhower. I sure hope so. It never struck me that McCullough liked Eisenhower as he described him as being unduly ugly to Truman. The two men had worked well together before.

His retirement years showed that Truman was perhaps the most “common man” modern president and tremendously likable. I don’t think he liked the work of any of his successors, but that may be only the cantankerousness of an old man. As much as I dislike his progressive domestic policies ( he was pretty good on foreign policy), I think he’d be one of the few presidents of the Twentieth Century I feel I could have related to enough to share, say, a meal or a long chat. I believe I like him personally more than professionally in some cases, or is that just attributed to master biographer McCullough swaying me? In any event, the book is majestic as presidential biographies go.

Check out other presidential biographies here.

The Henry Morris Signature Collection

Here is a set of books that would be an incredible resource for any student of the Bible or any Christian family. Henry Morris is a stalwart figure in Biblical Creationism and for all the literature produced in recent years in that field you’d be hard pressed to find anything that he hadn’t already said here. I think of him as the perfect marriage between science and childlike faith. He has the skills to go to the deepest levels of technical science while making himself clear to those of us who’ve thought little of it since our school days. He’s no slouch in theology either.

I first encountered Dr. Morris when I was a young Christian including some of these books. It’s been fun to drink from these waters again and to encounter some titles never seen before. There’s not a dud in the lot, but let me focus on four titles:

  1. The Biblical Basis for Science—This huge book is a semester class in itself. In fact, I wish every young person went through it. Here is where the depth of Dr. Morris’ ability shines forth. Many of the great scientific disciplines are covered to the point you’d have a grasp of them and yet it’s tied to theology just as deep. At one point he was discussing the Triunity of God as well as the Hypostatic Union. Can you image the value of young people having this exposure? For that matter, most adults need it too. If I only wanted one of his books, I’d likely pick this one.
  2. Scientific Creationism—This one takes an interesting track. Seven of its eight chapters pit two items, e.g. chaos or cosmos; accident or plan, to discuss Creation versus Evolution. The final lengthy chapter tackles some of the main issues in Creationism with Scriptural evidence.
  3. Many Infallible Proofs—Don’t miss this one. It takes Scriptural issues and uses science to help with its assessment. This one is also on its own track and is not a regurgitation of other books at all.
  4. The Beginning of the World—I loved this commentary on the earlier chapters of Genesis.

Don’t overlook the rest of the set. “Men of Science, Men of God” is a jewel of a little book that shows that all the gifted fathers of Science were avowed Bible believers. “Biblical Creationism” is actually designed like many modern works of Biblical theology. He traces the theme from Genesis to Revelation, which is a wonderful way to consider a subject at the macro level. “God and the Nations” takes a look at civilizations in biblical history and casts an eye toward prophecy. In “The Bible Has the Answer” Dr. Morris tackles a wide variety of difficult questions. This is likely one you will reference rather than read cover to cover.

Two of the titles would be helpful especially from an apologetics standpoint: “Defending the Faith” and “The Long War Against God”.

I would read “What Is Creation Science?” last not because it’s inferior, but because it’s the most technical. After you ingested the others, you would no doubt be ready for it.

These books are awesome. There is some overlap with a few of the titles, but the learning that could gleaned here is incalculable. I highly recommend them.

I received this book free from the publisher. I was not required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255.

Ezra and Nehemiah (TOTC) by Geert Lorein

The TOTC series gives us a new work on Ezra and Nehemiah here. Geert Lorein is a unique choice for this volume as he previously wrote a commentary on these books in Dutch. While bringing us Dutch theologians used to be a thing, it’s been a while since I noticed one show up as a new commentary. Clearly, Lorein is up to the task.

Perhaps the oddest thing about the commentary is how the author switches back and forth from writing to a brand new Bible student to that then of a seasoned student. It doesn’t sink the book, but it is noticeable.

The Introduction is full for this series and concludes pretty conservatively. He digs quickly into the historical background. (It’s comical how much he didn’t like the publisher asking him to use miles rather than kilometers!). There are even occasional maps and charts that are quite helpful. He well describes the context like with, say, Xerxes. Additionally, he describes the relationship of Ezra and Nehemiah as most scholars today treat them as one work. There’s more information on the shape of the text than readers of this series would desire, but it’s here if you want it. His discussion of theology is good as far as it goes.

In this series it’s the commentary proper that most are after and it’s good. There’s around 180 pages of text for that task and so pastors can get some real help studying the passages. Getting context, comment and meaning on each section is a good design. Like Goldilocks of old the commentary section is pitched just right. For that reason, I can warmly recommend it.

I received this book free from the publisher. I was not required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255.

2 Samuel (EEC) by Harry Hoffner

Hoffner continues his outstanding work begun in the volume on 1 Samuel with another mammoth 1000-page volume here. The same outstanding features and thoroughness can be found here too. For that matter, the entire Introduction is repeated here. That is handy because you wouldn’t have to walk to the shelf for the other volume for those introductory matters.

In addition to all I said in my review on the other volume, let me add a word about the depth of exegetical work given here. Of course it provides all any pastor would need on that score, but it will likely satisfy the most in-depth scholarly work at the academy as well. If you read Hebrew, you have it here. If you don’t, you can almost always follow the argument well.

Some might say the theology isn’t to the level of some volumes, but look carefully at the “commentary” section for each passage. Not only is it incredibly full, but there is theology embedded in that section if you are looking for it. You will find then that it’s pretty good too.

I’ve wanted this volume for years, so I applaud its release. Give this one a try. You’ll be glad you did!

I received this book free from the publisher. I was not required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255.

1 Samuel (EEC) by Harry Hoffner

I’m so grateful this commentary finally made it to a physical copy. Though it’s been available digitally for a decade, there are those weirdos like me who must hold it in our hands. Perhaps there are several of us because this book does not hold the elevated place it should. It is a magnificent commentary. Cliche or not, it is a game changer.

What will startle you right off the bat is just how massive it is. Unlike some other large works, there is no filler material that I can see. It is all a treasure trove of learning to help you make sense of the books of Samuel.

Perhaps it invites comparison to the brand new sparkling commentary by Oswalt on the books of Kings released the same day. I would describe Oswalt’s work as a book that is fantastic with the forest view while there are a sufficient number of trees. I would call this work outstanding with all of its trees, but still with the sufficient forest view. I simply can’t remember a better single day of releases in the realm of commentaries ever.

The Introduction runs 120 pages but there’s a huge bibliography and detailed outline that make up the last third of it. Still, with 80 pages of text every typical introductory issue is addressed. Highlights include a well-done review of all the characters in the book. That will be a tremendous help to pastors and teachers. He’s a good writer too as I found no tedium in reading the Introduction and he is friendly to conservative views as he addresses every current in the river of scholarship on Samuel. Academic types will be impressed as well. Pastors can skip just a few sections and will still have everything they need.

The commentary proper is also excellent. It is very full. It is in this part that his other talent comes to light. Hoffner has such historical breadth and writes a commentary that probably not a lot of other people could.

I will say again that this is a huge commentary, but I will also say that it is worth the space it will take up on your shelf. I cannot think of another commentary on Samuel that compares to it. When Lexham took the necessary steps to bring this volume to us, they did us all a big favor. 

I received this book free from the publisher. I was not required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255.

2 Kings (EEC) by John Oswalt

Having already reviewed the volume on 1 Kings and giving it the highest possible rating, I can say that I’m just as enamored with this continuation in 2 Kings. As you know, the Books of Kings were one work in the Hebrew Scriptures anyway, but the thrilling story of Elijah and Elisha is interrupted by the break in between 1& 2 Kings. So one of the two just won’t do. Still, if for some reason you need 2 Kings only the publisher has reprinted the magnificent Introduction here as well as all the excursuses from the other volume. I can’t remember seeing that done before, but it’s a great idea.

It’s the God’s-eye view that makes the Introduction so stellar. Additionally, the pivotal history of the period of the Kings has never been better described than here. It actually reaches the level of exciting.

Oswalt took his time with this work, so there’s no drop off before we reach the end of 2 Kings. That same masterful, conservative work permeates every page. The EEC now has several top level commentaries and this one is as good as any of them.

I received this book free from the publisher. I was not required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255.

1 Kings (EEC) by John Oswalt

Now the Books of Kings have a great commentary. Never has Kings been served as well as most other OT books. Especially that is the case with good conservative commentaries. We’ve had the NAC volume and not much else. Now this volume goes straight from the printing press to pride of place with a bullet.

The Introduction is a masterpiece. I’ve reviewed several commentaries and I’d say it’s barely one out of thirty that so unravels the idea of the book as Oswalt did. The trees are fine here, but the forest is exquisite. There’s no section on structure per se, but the biblical theology is so apropos that you get the best that a discussion of structure could ever provide. I love it not because I agree with it, though I do, but because it’s so masterfully explained. You can feel the excitement and only love Kings better.

The commentary is obviously the work of a master. Can you believe all the time that’s passed since his beloved Isaiah came out? There’s no rust; just excellent exegesis. If you forced me to list a negative feature, maybe a few of the passages are a bit too brief, but it’s not enough to lower it’s high rating.

I love Kings. The Elijah/Elisha section is spectacular. Oswalt doesn’t miss that section’s prominence in the design of Kings either.

For me, this one is a treat. It’s no gamble to say you’ll think the same thing.

I received this book free from the publisher. I was not required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255.

Shapers of Christianity by Nick Needham

What an interesting little book! I love books that take several faith heroes and in a chapter try to pique our interest. Mr. Needham aced that assignment. How or why he picked these twelve men is beyond me. I think he tried to pick from various epochs of church history, but beyond that I have no idea. I guess he picked mostly theologians, but then he threw in John Wesley who is remembered more for piety and revival. He even alternated the well known with the not so well known. The unusual setup notwithstanding, this book was a joy to read.

Mr. Needham is well equipped to write this book since he has produced the much larger “2000 Years of Christ’s Power”. I have not seen that work, but judging by this book, it must be a good one.

One little icing on the cake that I noticed is that he often surveyed their writings. That was especially helpful when covering someone not known to you. The only problem is that it might add many listings to your buy list.

While he judged every biographical subject by their adherence to Reformation thinking, he did dip outside those actual boundaries. That made for some of the most interesting chapters in the book. Theophylact (completely unknown to me) was one of the most engaging in this volume. It was so good that it made you wonder, why have I never heard of this guy?

He had some of the usual suspects as well. There was Jonathan Edwards, B. B. Warfield, and J. Gresham Machen among others.

He did really well in a short space of showing why these men are compelling to know, and to know more about. This book will not take you long to read, but mark it down in the pleasant category. 

I received this book free from the publisher. I was not required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255.

Numbers (TOTC) by Altmann & Peres

Here’s the latest in the popular TOTC series. This 380-page commentary is quite hefty for this series. Joint authors are not as common either, but it did the volume no harm. The Preface tells which author wrote which part, but it was seamless enough to make you forget that there are two writers at work. Some concessions are made to higher critical theories, but no more than some earlier volumes in this series. The authors no matter your level of agreement were excellent writers and could hold your attention well.

The Introduction was thoroughly interesting even if I disagreed with whole paragraphs. The section on “from impurity to holiness” was easily the most captivating. It made more sense than some larger works on the subject. Some of the most far fetched ideas were its explanation of ritual practices as “embodied experiences” or those of the Offerings. Its discussions of the Christian application of the book were unique. I’m not saying they were off, only that they on their on track.

A question you have to discuss in every commentary on this book is how you take the numbers given. In other words, are they literal? Here the authors say no. They do not say they are in error, but only that they are hyperbolic.

The commentary is well done along the lines of this series. As usual, it’s mid-level in depth while providing an economical option that will be enough for most Bible students. For others with larger libraries it’s a fine secondary resource.

I received this book free from the publisher. I was not required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255.

Isaiah 1-39 (RCS), Edited by Jeff Fisher

This is one of the best volumes I’ve seen in this series. Jeff Fisher did a great job editing. Choices in this type volume are of necessity almost arbitrary, but he chooses well. Isaiah, called by some the gospel of the OT, probably helped. Isaiah 1-39 is not as popular as the rest of the book because of its somber tone, but there are many great passages here that would be right up the alley of the Reformers.

Fisher also wrote an excellent Introduction. I loved his chart of all the major commentaries on Isaiah from those days, which made you aware of what he had to work with right off the bat. Besides Calvin and a few others the list is from those unknown to me. That doesn’t hurt the book, but all the usual suspects aren’t there. Even more helpful is his discussion of these commentator’s key themes. Don’t miss that section for sure.

The selections are what you’d expect compared to previous volumes in the series. There are jewels abounding with just a few where you ask, so what?

To borrow Spurgeon’s language, this volume isn’t the main dish but it a fine condiment to spice it up.

I received this book free from the publisher. I was not required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255.